The Matter of Blood Eating
This past Sunday morning, as I sat in my chair awaiting the passing of the "fruit of the vine," I was pondering why my Savior would have given His precious life-blood for my sins. Suddenly, I was taken back to a matter that I had referred to in some recent posts with my brethren.
The thought came to me that Christians do not eat the blood of animals since God had ordained that the blood contained the life of any animal, including man. Is man an animal? Not in the spiritual sense but he certainly is from a biological or a zoological aspect. Just as any other fleshly animal, man depends upon blood to provide the nutrients, including oxygen and carbon dioxide, glucose, fats, vitamins, etc. necessary for maintaining life.
Yet it was the very thing that gives life that God had required, in ages past, to be shed for the sins of man. With that thought in mind, let us answer a troublesome but doctrinal question regarding the consumption of blood by man.
In The Beginning:
In Genesis 1:29-30, after God had created greenery and the animals and fowls if the air, we note what Moses has to say:
"And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so."
Contrary to what some might imply regarding the eating of meat, God gives specific permission here for man to eat of the herbs (plant life). And, He gives the same permission to other life forms such as the fowls of the air and the beasts of the field, even those things that creep (snakes). More importantly, this original statement of God, in Genesis 1:30, indicates that the life was in the blood of all creatures, including man himself. That is a very important fact that has much significance regarding life itself.
Then, after the great flood of Noah’s day, God tells Noah that he, his sons and all who would come after them, could eat the flesh of other animals, but only if the blood had been drained from them. Why? Because, as God explains to Noah, “Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. But flesh with the life thereof, which is the blood thereof, shall ye not eat” (Gen 9:3,4). It was because the life of the animal was in the blood.
Note also that God institutes another universal principle here that pertains to the execution of justice regarding murder. God tells Noah:
“And surely your blood of your lives will I require; at the hand of every beast will I require it, and at the hand of man; at the hand of every man's brother will I require the life of man. Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.” (Gen 9:5,6)
And from subsequent passages in God's word, we take serious note that man was not allowed to eat of any flesh unless the blood (the life thereof) was drained from it. In 1 Timothy 4:3-4, Paul makes note that there would arise false teachers who would prohibit several things, including the eating of meat. But, notice that in verse 4, Paul makes it expressly clear that ALL animals were to be considered as food if they were received with thanksgiving.
Thus, meat eating has always been permissible for man since the flood. Because of specific reasons, God saw fit to restrict the Jews to eating certain types of animals and fishes. Why? We cannot say. All that we can ascertain is that God said so! Are those animals forbidden for man today? For the most part, no. Only those animals such as those which eat carrion (decaying flesh, otherwise known here in the southern states as "road-kill") are still considered unacceptable to man. Common sense and personal hygiene dictate that. But 1 Timothy 4:3-4 gives full permission to all men to eat the flesh of most animals today.
The Patriarchal Period:
Even in the dawn of man's existence here on earth, blood played a significant part of God's prohibitions and His enforced rituals for His people. When Cain rose up out of jealousy and killed his brother, God told him that Abel's blood "cried out from the earth." It was Abel's blood that contained his life and it was that part of him that God recognized as carrying the life of Abel. Hence, his blood made testimony that his body and his blood had been separated. As we’ve already seen, God allowed Noah, his sons and all their dependents to eat flesh, but only after the blood (the life) had been drained from it.
In Genesis 22:1-14, Moses records the events of Abraham being asked to sacrifice his son upon the altar he constructed at Mt. Moriah. After binding his son, he raised his knife, but the angel stayed his hand. Having raised his knife indicates that his methodology to kill his only son was a method of separating his life from his flesh. Hence, life was in the blood.
The Jewish Age:
After God had delivered the children of Israel under Moses' leadership, He gave them a series of restrictions to regulate their conduct. Among these are the restrictions of sacrifice where the animal's blood would be separated from the flesh and offered unto God. The priests were permitted to eat of the burnt flesh but the blood was allowed to run forth on the ground. Why? So that the life and flesh might be fully separated. (Leviticus !:5, 11, 12)
It is also to be noted here that the Jews were forbidden
to eat of flesh from which had not been separated the blood. In Leviticus 3:17,
God forbade the Jews from ever eating fat or blood. In Lev. 7:26, 27,
God again reminds His people that they could not eat blood lest they be separated from the house of Israel. In Lev 17:11, 14, God again speaks to the children of Israel and forbids them to eat of the blood of any animal and makes other restrictions regarding the eating of flesh that has been killed by another animal. It is expressly clear that the eating of blood has always been prohibited by God up to this time.
The Christian Age:
Some have surmised that because the law of Christ replaced
the past laws, especially the Law of Moses, that the restrictions of God regarding
the eating of blood specifically has been abolished. But that is not the case.
In Acts 15:1, Luke records that some men came from Judea teaching the keeping
of the Law of Moses, especially circumcision. In order to settle this question,
several men, including Paul and Barnabas went back to Jerusalem to clarify the
matter. They presented their case to Peter and the others, including the other
apostles and the elders of the church. As a result of this meeting, Paul, Barnabas
and the other men carried a directive (a letter from the Jerusalem church) telling
them that there were only four things in common with the Law of Moses that they
were to avoid as Christians. These were (1. pollutions from idols, (2. fornication.
(3. things that had been strangled and (4. the eating of blood (verse 20).
One can rightly conclude that the reason for these was that (1. God has always been a jealous God, that idolatry has always been a sin, (2. fornication has always been a sin before God, (3 that strangled animals still contain the blood and (4. that the life is in the animal and the blood is that which gives any animal life.
This latter has always been a fact of God since creation (Genesis 1:30). These prohibitions are not simply a part of the Law of Moses but have been God's law since creation. Like marriage, these are basic rules that have remained true since man's creation. Some state that this has only to do with the worship rituals of God's people, especially the Jews. My answer is that God has ALWAYS considered that blood contains the life of any animal, including man. Therefore, it is a sin to eat of any animal which has not been drained of its life-giving substance; namely the blood.
Hence we see the importance of the life-giving blood, not only of the sacrifices of God's people in the past, but also of His only begotten Son who poured out His life-blood for our sins upon the cross. The only consumption of blood that is allowed under God is that metaphorical consumption that we observe on the first day of the week in the fruit of the vine.
The human consumption of the blood of any animal is a sin today, just as much as it was under the previous ages. And, the only exception is the observance of the Lord's Supper wherein we partake of the emblem that reflects His precious blood. Yes, many societies have adopted the eating of sausages, puddings or other foods that have blood as the main ingredient. Many other native tribes do eat blood and think nothing of such. But the Lord's commandment to Christians is to "keep themselves from things sacrificed to idols, and from blood, and from what is strangled, and from fornication" (Acts 15:20). Our obligation is to preach and teach the whole counsel of God, not part of the counsel, but ALL of it. We should preach against any sinful practice wherever we may find it. If we don't then we are not true to our commitment to God. Why? Because the Christian cannot indulge in of any of these four sinful things. To do so is just as unlawful today as it has been in ages past.
By Howard Justice
Return to General Articles
Home / Bible studies / Bible Survey / Special Studies / General Articles / Non-Bible Articles / Sermons / Sermon Outlines / Links / Questions and Answers / What Saith The Scriptures /Daily Devotional / Correspondence Courses / What is the Church of Christ / Book: Christian Growth / Website Policy / E-mail / About Me /